1 00:00:00,100 --> 00:00:01,264 - [Voiceover] All right, part d. 2 00:00:01,264 --> 00:00:02,651 Explain how any correct aspects 3 00:00:02,651 --> 00:00:05,066 of the student's reasoning identified in part b 4 00:00:05,066 --> 00:00:09,362 are expressed by your mathematical relationships in part c, 5 00:00:09,362 --> 00:00:11,823 and explain how your relationship in part c correct, 6 00:00:11,823 --> 00:00:13,570 how your relationships in part c 7 00:00:13,570 --> 00:00:16,210 correct any incorrect aspects of the student's reasoning 8 00:00:16,210 --> 00:00:17,425 identified in part b. 9 00:00:17,425 --> 00:00:18,308 It's a bit of a mouthful, 10 00:00:18,308 --> 00:00:19,107 but they're just saying, 11 00:00:19,107 --> 00:00:21,665 "Hey, kinda connect the dots between part c" 12 00:00:21,665 --> 00:00:23,194 "and the two parts of part b." 13 00:00:23,194 --> 00:00:25,453 Refer to the relationships you wrote in part c, 14 00:00:25,453 --> 00:00:26,753 not just the final answer you obtained 15 00:00:26,753 --> 00:00:29,394 by manipulating those relationships. 16 00:00:29,394 --> 00:00:30,735 And so we can, 17 00:00:30,735 --> 00:00:33,487 let me write it down here. 18 00:00:33,487 --> 00:00:34,578 So d. 19 00:00:34,578 --> 00:00:37,468 So part c 20 00:00:37,468 --> 00:00:40,997 shows us 21 00:00:40,997 --> 00:00:44,361 that doubling, 22 00:00:44,361 --> 00:00:47,801 doubling compression 23 00:00:49,031 --> 00:00:53,287 does result in more potential energy. 24 00:00:53,287 --> 00:00:57,987 Doubling compression does result 25 00:00:59,040 --> 00:01:03,498 in more, 26 00:01:03,498 --> 00:01:05,797 in more energy. 27 00:01:05,797 --> 00:01:08,258 And you could clarify that this is, 28 00:01:08,258 --> 00:01:11,207 this is potential, 29 00:01:11,207 --> 00:01:15,642 potential and kinetic 30 00:01:15,642 --> 00:01:17,476 at different points in time. 31 00:01:17,476 --> 00:01:19,636 And then we could even draw a line to it. 32 00:01:19,636 --> 00:01:21,424 So we see that, 33 00:01:21,424 --> 00:01:22,979 we see that right over here. 34 00:01:22,979 --> 00:01:25,563 That is, that is these, 35 00:01:25,563 --> 00:01:26,703 that line, 36 00:01:26,703 --> 00:01:29,179 and then that line right over there shows that. 37 00:01:29,179 --> 00:01:32,299 So I could draw a bit of an arrow to it. 38 00:01:32,299 --> 00:01:35,757 They want us to reference some of what we saw before. 39 00:01:35,757 --> 00:01:38,188 And just to make it clear, 40 00:01:38,188 --> 00:01:39,976 I can put in parentheses. 41 00:01:39,976 --> 00:01:44,053 I can show that U two is equal to four U one, 42 00:01:44,053 --> 00:01:49,053 and that K two is equal to four, 43 00:01:49,102 --> 00:01:52,491 four K one. 44 00:01:52,491 --> 00:01:56,573 However, however, 45 00:01:58,158 --> 00:02:00,224 however, 46 00:02:00,224 --> 00:02:04,884 since the kinetic energy, 47 00:02:04,884 --> 00:02:09,320 since the kinetic 48 00:02:09,320 --> 00:02:12,402 energy 49 00:02:12,402 --> 00:02:17,332 is four times greater, 50 00:02:19,497 --> 00:02:24,000 and you have 51 00:02:26,300 --> 00:02:31,300 the same, same force of friction, 52 00:02:32,059 --> 00:02:36,447 force of friction, 53 00:02:36,447 --> 00:02:41,207 the distance is going to be four times as long. 54 00:02:41,207 --> 00:02:44,151 The stopping distance, 55 00:02:45,480 --> 00:02:47,825 distance, 56 00:02:47,825 --> 00:02:50,472 is going to be four times as much. 57 00:02:50,472 --> 00:02:54,434 Is going to be 58 00:02:54,434 --> 00:02:58,979 four times as long. 59 00:03:00,123 --> 00:03:00,842 And even when we, 60 00:03:00,842 --> 00:03:02,282 so the correct parts. 61 00:03:02,282 --> 00:03:04,674 Part c shows us that doubling the compression 62 00:03:04,674 --> 00:03:07,251 does result in more energy. 63 00:03:07,251 --> 00:03:11,068 And I could add and more stopping distance. 64 00:03:11,068 --> 00:03:12,804 Let me do it there. 65 00:03:12,804 --> 00:03:17,753 And more stopping, 66 00:03:19,535 --> 00:03:23,289 stopping distance. 67 00:03:23,289 --> 00:03:24,179 Whoops. 68 00:03:24,179 --> 00:03:25,780 And more stopping distance. 69 00:03:25,780 --> 00:03:27,383 And the stopping distance, 70 00:03:27,383 --> 00:03:29,705 that arrow is easier to draw. 71 00:03:29,705 --> 00:03:32,491 And more stopping distance. 72 00:03:32,491 --> 00:03:36,276 However, since the kinetic energy is four times greater, 73 00:03:36,276 --> 00:03:38,111 and you have the same force of friction, 74 00:03:38,111 --> 00:03:39,712 the stopping distance is going to be 75 00:03:39,712 --> 00:03:42,546 four times as long. 76 00:03:42,546 --> 00:03:45,050 And we saw that as well over there. 77 00:03:45,050 --> 00:03:45,893 So we're saying hey look, 78 00:03:45,893 --> 00:03:47,747 the student was right 79 00:03:47,747 --> 00:03:50,162 that more compression is more energy, 80 00:03:50,162 --> 00:03:51,346 more stopping distance. 81 00:03:51,346 --> 00:03:53,668 However, it's going to be four times as long, 82 00:03:53,668 --> 00:03:55,270 the stopping distance, 83 00:03:55,270 --> 00:04:00,130 not two times 84 00:04:00,130 --> 00:04:02,081 as, 85 00:04:02,081 --> 00:04:03,798 not two times as far. 86 00:04:03,798 --> 00:00:00,000 And there you go.