I'm now going to introduce you to the notion of the
efficiency of an engine.
And it's represented by the Greek letter eta.
Even though it sounds like an e, it looks like a kind of
funny-looking n.
So Greek letter eta, this is efficiency.
And efficiency as applies to engines is kind of similar to
the way we use the word in our everyday life.
If I said, how efficient are you with your time, I care
about, what are you doing with that hour that I gave you?
Or if I said, how efficient are you with your money, I'd
say, how much were you able to buy with that $100 I gave you?
So efficiency with an engine is the same thing.
What were you able to do with the stuff that I gave you?
So in the engine world, we define efficiency to be, the
work you did with the energy that I gave you to do the
work, essentially.
And in our Carnot world, up here, this is all the stuff
I'd done before, what was the energy that I had given you?
Well, the energy that I'd given you was the energy that
came from this first reservoir up here.
Remember, when we were moving the pebbles from A to B, we
were moving the pebbles to keep it as a quasistatic
process, so that we can go back, if we had to, and so
that the system stayed in equilibrium the whole time.
If we didn't have this reservoir here, the
temperature would have gone down, because we're expanding
the volume, and all of that.
So we had to keep that reservoir there.
The added heat to the system, we figured out this multiple
times, was Q1.
It was equivalent to the work we did over that time period,
so it would have been the whole shaded region, not just
what's inside the circle.
But so the heat that we gave you was Q1.
You later gave some heat back, when some work
was done for you.
But what we care about is the heat that we were given.
So in this case, it would be Q1.
And what was the work that you did?
Well, the net work that you did was the shaded area.
It was the area inside of our Carnot cycle.
So that's our definition for efficiency.
It's always going to be a fraction.
Sometimes it's given as a percentage, where you just,
you know, this is 0.56.
You would call that 56% efficient.
Which is essentially saying, you were able to transfer 56%
of the heat energy that you were given, and turn that into
useful work.
And so it makes sense, at least in my head, that that
would be the definition for efficiency.
Now le'ts see if we can play around with this, and see how
efficiency would play out with some of the variables we're
dealing with in the Carnot cycle.
So what was the work that we did?
Well, we know our definition of internal energy.
Our definition of internal energy has been more useful
than you would have thought, for such a simple equation.
Our change in internal energy is the net heat applied to the
system minus the work done by the system.
Right?
Now, when you complete one Carnot cycle, when you go from
a all the way around back to a, and actually, I'll make a
little aside here.
You could have actually gone the other
way around the cycle.
But when you go the way we went the first time, when you
go clockwise, you're a Carnot engine.
You're doing work, and you're transferring
heat from T1 to T2.
If you went the other way around the circle,
essentially, you'd be a Carnot refrigerator, where you would
have work being done to you, and I'll touch on this in a
second, and you'd be transferring
energy the other way.
And this will be important to our proof of why the Carnot
engine is the best engine, at least theoretically, from an
efficiency point of view.
If efficiency is all you cared about.
But anyway.
That's what I was talking about.
So if I go a complete cycle in this PV diagram and I end up
back at A, what's my change in internal energy?
It's 0.
My internal energy is a state variable, so my change in
internal energy is 0.
My change in entropy would also be 0.
It's another state variable, when I get from A back to A.
So over the course of this cycle, we know that my change
in internal energy is 0.
What's the net heat applied to the system?
Well, we applied Q1 to the system, and then we
took out Q2, right?
We gave that to the second reservoir.
We gave that down there to T2, to that second reservoir.
And then minus work-- and all of this is equal to 0.
This is the net, i just want to make it clear, this is the
net heat applied to our system.
So the work done by the system-- we just add W to both
sides of this equation, you get W is equal to Q1 minus Q2.
So there we have it.
Let's just substitute that back here.
And instead of W, we can write Q1 minus Q2 as the numerator
in our in our efficiency definition, and then the
denominator is still Q1.
And we can do a little bit of math.
This simplifies-- this is Q1.
This is the heat we put into it.
So it's the net heat we applied to the system divided
by the heat we put into it.
So this is equal to-- Q1 divided by Q1 is 1,
minus Q2 over Q1.
So once again, this is another interesting definition of
efficiency.
They're all algebraic manipulations using the
definition of internal energy, and whatever else.
Now let's see if we can somehow relate efficiency to
our temperatures.
Now, let me-- this is Q1 right there.
So what were Q2 and Q1?
What were they?
What were their absolute values, not looking at the
signs of them?
I mean, we know that Q2 was transferred out of the system,
so if we said Q2 in terms of the energy applied to the
system, it would be a negative number.
But if we just wanted to know the magnitude of Q2, what
would it be, and the magnitude of Q1?
Well, the magnitude of Q1-- let me draw a new Carnot
cycle, just for cleanliness.
I'll draw a little small one over here.
That's my volume axis.
That's my pressure axis.
PV.
I start here at some state, and then I go isothermally.
What's a good color for an isothermal expansion?
Maybe purple.
It's kind of-- let's see.
An isothermal expansion.
I'm on an isotherm here.
So I go down there, and I go to state, and I went
down to state B.
So this is A to B.
And we know we are an isotherm.
This is when Q1 was added.
This is an isotherm.
If your temperature didn't change, your internal energy
didn't change.
And like I said before, if your internal energy is 0,
then the heat applied to the system is the same as
the work you did.
They cancel each other out.
That's why you got to 0.
So this Q1 that we apply to the system, it must be equal
to the work we did.
And the work we did is just the area under this curve.
We did this multiple times.
And why is it the area under the curve?
Because it's a bunch of rectangles of
pressure times volume.
And then you just add up all the rectangles, an infinite
number of infinitely narrow rectangles,
and you get the area.
And what is that?
Just a review-- pressure times volume was the work, right?
Because we're expanding the cylinder.
We're moving up that piston.
We're doing force times distance.
So the amount Q1 is equal to that integral-- the amount of
work we did as well-- is equal to the integral from V final--
I shouldn't say V final.
from VB, from our volume at B-- oh sorry.
From our volume at A to our volume at B.
We're starting here, and we're going to our volume at B.
And we're taking the integral of pressure-- and I've done
this multiple times, but I'll do it again.
So the pressure, our height, times our
change in volume, dv.
We go back to our ideal gas formula, PV is equal to nRT,
divide both sides by V, and you get P is
equal to nRT over V.
And so you have Q1 is equal to the integral of VA from VA to
VB of this little thing over here.
nRT over V dv.
All of this stuff up here, these are all constants.
Remember, we're an isotherm.
Our temperature isn't changing.
We could write T1 there, because that's our
temperature.
We're at T1.
We're on a T1 isotherm right there, because we're touching
the T1 reservoir.
But this is all a constant, so we can take
it out of the equation.
And then we've evaluated this multiple times, so I won't go
into the mechanics of the integral.
But so this is Q1 is equal to our constant terms, nRT1 times
this definite integral.
All we have left in the integral is 1 over V The
antiderivative of that is natural log, and then you
evaluated the two boundaries.
So you get the natural log of VB minus VA, which is the same
thing as the natural log of VB over VA.
Fair enough.
This right here is Q1.
All right.
Now what is Q2?
Q2 was this part of the Carnot cycle.
Q2 is when we went from C to D.
So the magnitude of Q2 is the area under this
curve, right here.
Now this is the work done to of the system, so that's why
we subtracted it out when we wanted to know the net work
done by the system.
And we ended up with this area over here, when you subtracted
this as well, over here on this side.
But if we just want to know the magnitude of Q2, we just
take the integral under this curve.
And what's the integral under that curve?
This is the heat out of the system, the heat that had to
be pushed out of the system as work was done to it.
So that integral-- so we could just say, the magnitude of
Q2-- I'll do it over here-- is equal to-- the same exact
logic applies, just the boundaries are different.
We're now going from-- and remember, when we cared about
the direction, I would say, I'm going from VC to VD.
But if I just want to know the absolute value of that area,
because I just want to know the magnitude, I could go from
VC to VD and just take the absolute value of it, or I
could just go from VD to VC, and I'd get a positive area.
So let me just do that.
So it's the integral from VD to VC.
Remember, the cycle we went from VC to VD, but I just want
the absolute value.
I want this to be positive.
So I'm turning it the other way.
Of P dv.
And we do the exact same math there.
You get Q2 is equal to nR-- this time the
temperature is T2.
We're on a T2 reservoir.
Times the natural log-- and this time,
what's it going to be?
Times the natural log of-- instead of VB over VA, it's
going to be VC divided by VD.
Now let's use these two pieces of information and substitute
them back into that results for efficiency we just got.
We just learned that you could also write the efficiency of
an engine to be equal to 1 minus Q-- let's
look back at it.
1 minus Q2 over Q1.
So let's substitute Q2 there and Q1 over here.
And what do you get?
You get the efficiency of your engine is equal to 1 minus--
Q2 is this expression over here-- nRT2 times the natural
log of VC over VD, all of that divided by Q1, which is this
one over here.
nRT1 times the natural log of VB over VA.
Now we can do a little bit of canceling.
Obviously the n and the r is cancel.
And we have these natural logs and all of that.
But I had a whole video dedicated to show you that VC
over dv is equal to VB over VA.
Now, if we know that these are equal, then
this is equal to this.
So the natural logs of them are equal,
so we can just divide.
And what are we left with?
We're left with the fact that efficiency can also be written
as 1 minus T2 over T1 for a Carnot engine.
Remember, this time, what we did over here, this applied to
any engine.
This was just a little bit of math and the definition of
what work is, and-- well, I won't go too much
into it right now.
But this is for a Carnot engine, right?
Because we did a little bit of work here that involved the
Carnot cycle.
But this is a pretty bit important outcome, because
we're going to show that the Carnot engine, in the next
video, is actually the most efficient engine that can ever
be attained.
Well, you have to be very careful about that, that when
we say efficient, it means that between two temperature
sources, you can't get a more efficient engine than the
Carnot engine.
Now, I'm not saying it's the best engine, or it's a
practical engine, or you'd want it to power your lawn
mower or your jet plane.
I'm just saying that it's the most efficient engine between
these two temperature reservoirs.
And I'll show you that in the next video.