Let's say we have two reservoirs.
Let's say up here, I have my hot reservoir.
It's at th for hot.
And I have my engine.
It's going to be a Carnot engine, because we'll learn
that no engine is better, at least from an
efficiency point of view.
We have to be careful when we say "better."
We have our Carnot engine, and it operates on heat
differentials.
So it takes some heat from our hot heat source.
It takes some heat there.
Let's call that q1.
And it does some work.
Work is a good thing, so I'll make that in green.
It does some work, and then the surplus energy, the
surplus heat, q2, then goes to our cold reservoir.
I'll do that right there.
t cold.
Now, I made multiple insinuations in the previous
video that this is the most efficient engine that can be
created between two reservoirs, th and tc.
Now, you come along and say, no, no, no, no, no.
I know of a friend, he has invented a new engine that is
more efficient than this engine between these same two
reservoirs.
And you go, and you proceed to draw this same type of diagram
for your friend's engine.
You say, look-- let me make it clear-- this is the same
reservoir, these same reservoirs we're dealing with.
Actually, I should probably draw this line all the way,
because I'm going to have to do multiple engines here.
So the same reservoir we're dealing with, right?
This is all the hot reservoir, th th, and this is all the
cold reservoir.
I need space for multiple engines that we're
going to deal with.
So your friend has an engine.
We'll call it the super engine.
And your friend's claim-- and I'll show you why your
friend's claim cannot be true, if you believe the second law
of thermodynamics-- so your friend's claim, they have the
super engine.
And they claim that look, I can actually take in q1.
I can take in that same heat from this heat source up here.
But I can produce more work than your Carnot engine.
I could produce 1 plus x.
I don't want to get too algebraic.
But let's say, you produce w.
I produce w times 1 plus x of work.
Where x is a positive number.
So he's saying, look, x is greater than 0.
Whatever that number he might feed you is.
And then the rest of the energy that's
left over is what?
It's q1 minus this.
So it's q1 minus w times 1 plus x.
And just to be clear, q2 right here, I could rewrite that as
q1 minus w.
Fair enough.
So you look at that.
You come to me with this, and I say, no, no, no, no.
This cannot be true.
Because if this were, then we would solve literally all of
the world's energy problems. And I'm about to show you why
we could solve all of the world's energy problems, and
we would have a perpetual motion machine, and be able to
defy all sorts of things if we had this.
Now, this is my Carnot engine.
But I could devise a reverse Carnot engine, right?
Let me make a reverse Carnot engine.
So my reverse Carnot engine would look like this.
And it's going to do the same thing, but in reverse.
So instead of producing q1 minus w here and putting it
into tc, it could take in q1 minus w from our cold source--
so could take that in-- or even better, let's scale it up
a little bit.
Let's say it takes in q1 minus w times 1 plus x.
So I've just made a slightly larger reversed Carnot engine.
Now, if I take in that much-- in order to do this in
reverse, I'm going to have to take in, I'm going to have to
scale up this Carnot engine and reverse everything.
So instead of producing work, I'm now going to need work to
go on the other direction, and I've scaled it up by 1 plus x.
So I'm going to need the amount of work here
times 1 plus x.
And then I'm going to push q1, but I've scaled it up.
I'm going to push in q1 times 1 plus x
into my hot heat source.
And once again, this isn't defying the laws of
thermodynamics.
I'm taking up some work.
There's work that needs to be done in order to do this.
But all of a sudden, you come to me and say, look, this is
an awesome deal.
You have this nice engine that works this way.
My friend has a super engine.
Let's just couple them together.
Let's take the work that he produces right here-- he
produces w times 1 plus x, and that just happens to be the
amount of work that you need to operate your engine.
So you just feed that into there.
So what's the net effect of these two engines?
So let me do another, scroll a little bit more.
Actually, that might be the best way to do it.
So let me make sure that we understand that these are the
same heat sinks or heat sources that we're using the
whole time.
So that's my hot source, my cold source is down here.
So if I add our two engines together-- so if I have a, you
know, let me call it a-- I'm going to pick a new color.
These colors are getting monotonous.
Nope.
I wanted to do the rectangle tool.
There you go.
All right.
So I combine these two engines together.
Essentially I just put a big box around them.
They're both operating between these two heat sources.
These two reservoirs.
So I call this the, you know, your super engine plus my
reverse Carnot engine.
So what's happening now?
What's the net heat that's being taken in
or put out of here?
So we have q1-- we have-- let me see.
We have q1 minus w 1 plus x, but in this direction, we have
q1-- so in this direction, we could rewrite this.
I want to make sure you're clear on the algebra.
This could be rewritten as what?
As q1 times 1 plus x times, or minus, w times 1 place x.
Right?
Now, if you compare these terms, this is the
same as this term.
This term is bigger than this term.
Right?
This term is clearly bigger, because we're multiplying it
by something larger than 1.
It's bigger than this storm.
So if we combine these two, the upward movement, or the
amount of heat I'm taking up from my reverse Carnot, is
going to be greater than the amount of heat being put in by
your friend's super engine.
And we can actually calculate the amount.
We can just take this amount minus that amount, and that's
the net upward movement.
So the net upward movement from our cold
reservoir is what?
It's this value minus this value.
So minus q1 minus w 1 plus x.
If we take a minus, we're going to subtract it.
So it's a minus and a plus.
These cancel out.
This minus cancels out with-- so this first term could be
rewritten as q1 plus q1x.
Right?
We could rewrite it that way.
So this cancels out with that.
And so the net upward movement when we combine the two
engines is q1 times x.
Fair enough.
Now what about the work transfer?
Well, whatever work this guy produces is exactly the amount
of work that I need.
So no outside work has to be done on the system.
It just works.
This guy produces work, this guy uses the work.
Now what's in that heat transferred
up to our hot reservoir?
What's the amount of heat?
Well, it's the difference between these two.
And this is clearly a larger number than this one, so the
upward movement dominates.
So what's this minus that?
So this can be rewritten as q1 plus q1x, right?
I just distributed the q1.
We're going to subtract that out.
Minus q1.
You're left with q1x.
So the net movement, when we combine the
two engines, is q1x.
So what's happening here?
I have no external energy or work has to be expended into
this system.
And it's just taking heat from a cold body, and it's moving
it to a warm body.
And it does this indefinitely.
It'll do this as much as I want to.
I can just build a bigger one.
It'll do it on even a larger and larger scale.
So if you think about it, I could heat my house with ice
by just making the ice colder.
I could create steam from things that arbitrarily cold.
This goes against the second law of thermodynamics.
The net entropy in this world is going down.
Because what's happening here?
This is just a straight up transfer of q1x from a cold
body to a hot body.
So what's the net change in entropy here?
The change in entropy of the universe.
Well, the hot body is gaining some heat, so it's q1x over
the temperature of the hot body, and then the cold body
is losing the same amount.
So it's minus q1x over the cold body.
Now, this is a bigger number than this is, right?
Because the denominator is smaller.
This is a cold body.
Its temperature in Kelvin will be a smaller number.
So this is going to be less than 0, which the second law
of thermodynamics tells us cannot be.
The entropy cannot shrink in the universe.
This whole thing is an independent system, and the
entropy is shrinking.
And we can make the entropy shrink arbitrarily if we just
scale up our x's enough.
So this is why the Carnot engine is the most efficient
engine possible.
Because if anyone claimed to have a more efficient engine,
you could couple it with a reverse Carnot engine, and
then create this perpetual reverse-- I guess you could
call it a perpetual refrigeration machine that
just out of the blue creates anti-entropy from anywhere,
and it would be this perpetual energy source that creates
energy out of nothing.
And so this is just something that cannot be done in our
world, especially if you believe the second law of
thermodynamics.
So the most efficient engine is the Carnot engine, where
its efficiency is described as 1 minus the temperature of the
cold body divided by the hot body.
So if I have two temperature reservoirs, let's say that my
hot one is at 500 Kelvin, and my cold one is at 300 Kelvin,
and I have some engine that takes heat from there, and
transfers it there, and does some work.
The most efficient engine, if I were to remove all the
friction in the engine, the highest efficiency I could get
would be 1 minus 300 Kelvin over 500 Kelvin, which is 1
minus 3/5, which is 2/5, which is equal to 0.4, which is
equal to 40%.
So if someone tells you that they made an engine that
operates between a reservoir that's 500 Kelvin and 300
Kelvin, and they say, oh, I've achieved 41% percent
efficiency.
I've really polished the thing well.
You know that they are lying.
So anyway, hopefully you found that reasonably interesting,
and I'll see you in the next video.